Title |
Mysterious Skin |
Copyright Title |
Mysterious Skin |
Released |
2004 |
Production Year |
2004 |
Director |
Gregg Araki
|
Comments |
Given the media hype surrounding the film, its supposed controversial subject matter, and my admiration of Gregg Arakiâs previous film, I was obviously very keen to watch Mysterious Skin to help assist my research on film censorship in Australia. Mysterious Skin turned out to be one of the most arresting and deeply moving films that I have ever experienced.
The beautifully lush, ethereal, spellbinding cinematography complemented by the haunting, ubiquitous soundtrack consumes, dislocates and distorts. It is very hard to explain in words how Araki ingeniously makes you want to be transported to this world, and at the same time pray upon your life that you will never be subjected to a world like that. But you realise that this is our world, and we are in it, awake, now.
Throughout the film I kept questioning to myself how someone would or could want to ever ban this film. Australian Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock accused Mysterious Skin as been a âhow-to-manualâ for paedophiles. I didnât attend the cinema to watch Mysterious Skin to learn how to be a paedophile, I strongly doubt anybody would. Put simply, if you are a paedophile, you are a paedophile, and you know what you are doing. Above all, it appears to be an easy yet very damning label to place on a film, especially if you havenât seen itâ¦
There are a couple of intense scenes where I felt paralysed. I felt like I couldnât watch but I felt like I couldnât turn away from it. There was nothing worthy of being banned. Mysterious Skin appears to be misunderstood by those who tried to ban it. It is a tender approach to child abuse and paedophilia, a film which I feel would help victims heal inner demons and come to terms with dark pasts. The film offers hope.
By attempting to ban Mysterious Skin one is essentially sweeping the issue under the carpet, by child abuse and paedophilia as subjects too confronting to discuss. Arakiâs voice is one of concern. The film expresses the voices of victims. It is not a threat to our society, it a brave and bold film which says more about the society we live in than anything else.
Dominique Chaleyer 2005 |
Synopsis |
""The summer I was eight years old, five hours disappeared from my life. Five hours, lost, gone without a trace..."
These are the words of Brian Lackey (Brady Corbet), a troubled 18 year-old, growing up in the stiflingly small town of Hutchinson, Kansas. Plagued by nightmares, Brian believes that he may have been the victim of an alien abduction. Local Neil McCormick (Joseph Gordon Levitt) however, is the ultimate beautiful outsider. With a loving but promiscuous mother (Elisabeth Shue), Neil is wise beyond his years and curious about his developing sexuality, having found what he perceived to be love from his Little League baseball coach (played by Hal Hartley veteran Bill Sage) at a very early age. Now, ten years later, Neil is a teenage hustler, nonchalant about the dangerous path his life is taking.
Neil's pursuit of love leads him to New York City, while Brian's voyage of self discovery leads him to Neil - who helps him to unlock the dark secrets of their past. Based on the acclaimed novel by Scott Heim, MYSTERIOUS SKIN explores the hearts and minds of two very different boys who come to find the key to their future happiness lies in the exorcism of their collective demons." By Gregg Araki, from http://www.mysteriousskinthemovie.com (2004) |
tags:
add tagPlease Wait...
|
|
|
|
References ( click to view )
|
web - At The Movies : Margaret Pomeranz talks to director Gregg Araki, local Australian film distributors and Melbourne Film Festival director about the controversial new f . 00-00-2005 |
Margaret Pomeranz
|
The interviews shed light on what local Australian film distributors feel about buying/distributing/screening 'controversial' films. Richard Payton, the Dend...[full record]
|
|
newspaper - Attempted film ban a mystery: Would-be censors missed the point of a caring film The Age. 19-08-2005. p.n.p. |
Craig Mathieson
|
Craig Mathieson meditates on the manner in which Mysterious Skin has been "dogged by accusations". Mathieson mentions the involvement of the Office of Film a...[full record]
|
|
newspaper - Attempted film ban a mystery: Would-be censors missed the points of a caring film The Age. 19-08-2005. p.n.p. |
Craig Mathieson
|
Craig Mathieson meditates on the manner in which Mysterious Skin has been "dogged by accusations". Mathieson mentions the involvement of the Office of Film a...[full record]
|
|
newspaper - Haunted by the past The Age. 21-08-2005. p.11 |
Tom Ryan
|
In his review Tom Ryan defends Mysterious Skin. He laments the manner in which the film "courts controvery simply because it's about paedophilia". Unlike oth...[full record]
|
|
journal - Movie Critique: Mysterious Skin The Newsletter of Advocates for Survivors of Child Abuse (ASCA). 01-09-2005. p.7 |
Cathy Kezelman
|
One of the most powerful articles I did read was written by Dr. Cathy Kezelman, the Chairman of the ASCA (Advocates for Survivors of Child Abuse), a medical ...[full record]
|
|
web - Mysterious Skin : Production Notes . 00-00-2004 |
Gregg Araki
|
"I hope that Mysterious Skin really has an impact on people and breaks the silence about a taboo subject. To me, the story is enlightening and needs to be to...[full record]
|
|
journal - Skin Deep: Acclaimed new film Mysterious Skin has survived a conservative backlash and looks set to make its mark in Australian Cinemas The Big Issue. pp.31-31 |
Ghita Loebenstein
|
Araki reveals his frustration with the manner in which Mysterious Skin has been unfairly placed in the same category as films such as Irreversible and Ken Pa...[full record]
|
|
web - The Australian : Child-abuse film faces ban after rating dispute |
Lawrie Zion
|
Zion examines how Australian Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock and Michael Atkinson demanded Mysterious Skin's rating be reviewed as he felt strongly that the...[full record]
|
|
|
Close References
|
|